Showing posts with label the road. Show all posts
Showing posts with label the road. Show all posts

Saturday, February 13, 2010

Sneaky, cheeky Friday afternoon movie (take 2)

The Road Cormac McCarthy, 2006
The Road (dir. John Hillcoat)

Ok, so this is an odd one, part book review, part cheeky flicks trip.  It began as it usually does, Marsh and I at the Arts eating cheese and mushroom toasties and drinking beer.  Quite possibly the best preparation I can imagine for a post-apocalyptic horror, or a mindless rom-com for that matter.

She won't admit it, but I probably dragged Marsh there.  I had read the novel the weekend we were in Germany, more than just reading it, I had devoured every page of it, anti-socially often spending the entire evening with my nose in it.  I hadn't intended to get so involved: this was just a substitute for the Philip Roth novel I was reading, the only reason it was temporarily ditched was due to the unfortunate presence of a swastika on the cover.  I had picked up The Road as a suck-it-and-see, with a view to a proper future read through.  After the first few pages I became involved in the story of Man and Boy on their journey to the coast.  I didn't know what they would find there if they reached it, and I suspected the journey itself (planned on a freebie oil company map) was more of a distraction from their impending deaths from starvation, rather than any real physical or spiritual journey.  What I liked and loathed in equal measure was the reluctance of McCarthy to detail the event that led to two people alone and cold on the road, scavenging husks of wheat from barns and cans from burned out supermarkets.  Quite simply, something happened and now nothing is as it was.  In the book the Man refers to cows as being extinct; in the film the Boy quibbles the phrase 'as the crow flies', as crows only exist in books.


There are two particularly distressing aspects of the story, dealt with differently in both book and film.  The most graphic is the threat of cannibalism, perhaps best illustrated in both by the farm they accidentally stumble upon where terrified, mutilated people are kept in a larder by a gang of survivors: the film will spare you from much worse.  There is constant reinforcement from the Man to the child that they are one of the 'good guys', the fact that one of the defining features of a good guy is that he doesn't eat people is a measure of how despairing the situation is.  Equally upsetting but much more subtle is the recurring motif of murder-suicide.  Charlize Theron, playing the Boy's mother, has a role that only exists in brief flashbacks within the novel.  Pregnant when the cataclysmic event takes place, she disagrees fundamentally with the Man about how, and if life can go on in this new world.  By the time we meet the characters they have only two bullets remaining in their handgun; we see them mime and rehearse a possible future murder-suicide, always with the knowledge that with everyone they encounter the need to defend themselves may leave them with an awful decision to make further down the line.  There was a constant fear as I read the book that the Man would kill the Boy to stop someone else killing him, using the same, twisted logic that hamster mothers use.

The experience of reading the book is one of breathtaking compulsion.  Despite the truly grotesque scenes throughout I was driven to read on, desperately hoping that there could be some kind of happy ending in this unwaveringly unhappy world.  A feeling joins you on the journey, one that convinces you that there can never be a truly happy ending, even if the novel ends on a high note.  This is because the book is the story of the road, and the motif of the road is always the journey through life, which inspite of the pleasing vignettes- the meal they eat in the bunker, the can of cola, the Boy's first bath- can only end with the main character defeated. 

On the technical side, the movie was very well shot on great locations mostly in Pennsylvania, but with some of the more urban scenes shot on in Katrina ravaged New Orleans.  The strength of the movie was in its realism, or perhaps its attempt to capture a real situation.  CGI was largely spurned in favour of using disused mines and, in a memorable scene, the Abandoned Pennsylvania Turnpike.  Make-up too was excellent, rendering Tinseltown lovelies as mouldering down and outs.  Mortensen, Theron and Duvall in particular shined; I found Kodi-Smit McPhee's portrayal the Boy as a little saccharin sweet for my liking.

I watched this film about a week after Up in the Air, another, but very different road movie.  The motif of the road, which represents the metaphorical journey through life, is one that interests me in the way it changes through the different stages of life.  Clooney's character in Up in the Air, Ryan Bingham, has very little in common with the Man apart from the fact that they both learn something about themselves and others on their journey.  The reason for this is that Bingham is in the middle of his journey, in what a commentator on Shakespeare (his/her name escapes me) called the tragic phase.  The critic believed that the early years of a character could be characterised by comedy, especially the joy of falling in love; the middle years are the times of jealousy, discomfort, dislocation and the tragic; finally, old age brings the prospect of resolution, reconciliation and forgiveness.  This doesn't entirely fit with Shakespeare or the road motif: for every Rosalind and Van Wilder, we have a Juliet and the entire cast of The Rules of Attraction.  You do get the feeling though that Bingham is in that transition phase where tough questions are being asked about his lifestyle; when we left him in the departures lounge at the end of the film, you thought that those questions aren't going to get any easier any time soon.  The Man copes with problems of another kind: the differences between comedy and tragedy are very subtle flavours- how do you decide whether you've had a good day or a bad day after the end of the world?  It's as unimaginable as defining good and bad by what, and who, they eat.  So does this make The Road a Romance?  Not quite, but it is about resolution, being in the wilderness, and the old giving way to the young; the preservation of hope and keeping the fire alive, which is probably the best ending we can hope for. 

Saturday, January 16, 2010

Cheeky, sneaky, Friday afternoon movie

Up in the Air (dir. Jason Reitman)

So Marsh and I snuck out yesterday afternoon to watch Up in the Air at the Arts. Watching movies in the afternoon is something that I always enjoy, you get to mix with an odd blend of retired people, students and one guy who looked like he worked a constant night-shift. After cheese toasties and beer for lunch (which always remind me of Blackburn library- the toasties, if not the beer) we settled down to watch George Clooney illustrate the ways in which air travel can still be glamorous and romantic. George's character, Ryan Bingham, lives in a whirl of loyalty cards, air miles, upgrades and Hilton suites; certainly not the kind of character who flies Easy Jet or ever struggles through security with three children and five suitcases. The routines of express check-in, complimentary drinks and room service are the circadian rhythms of his life on the road. "To know me, is to fly with me," he declares in an opening scene voice over, but there is more to him than the jet lifestyle; for every complimentary vodka tonic there is a faceless snowy car park or anonymous office block. Ryan's job is an emploment transition specialist: he fires people for a living, fires people whose bosses have been too cowardly, gutless or busy to actually do the dirty themselves. His very entrance into a building provokes a sense of terror and recoil in the unfortunate soon to be ex-employees, like a spectre of death or pestilence moving across the drab industrial carpet tiles.

During his regular motivational speaking engagements Bingham declares 'We're not swans. We're sharks,' his message in 'What's in your backpack?' is that if you want to live the no strings lifestyle he promotes, then we must down-size our stuff; stuff includes our personal relations. A chance meeting on the road with Alex, Vera Farmiga on top form, piques his interest. She's smart, sassy, sexy and most importantly, she's a shark too- line of the film for me was 'just think of me as yourself, only with a vagina.' The easy route for the story would be for Bingham to fall in love with and be reformed by Alex, but this film resists easy, twee conclusions, witnessed by Alex and Ryan's post coital laptop schedule checking to arrange their next encounter.

There has to be thaw though, and when it comes it seems quite hokey. The groundwork is done by Natalie (Anna Kendrick), a new high flier (but not in the Bingham sense) at the company. A soft centre affecting a hard shell, Natalie becomes a walking , talking conscience for Bingham when she accompanies him on the road- her emotional outpouring in the hotel lobby is also one of the best incidents of schadenfreude I've ever experienced. Natalie's grand idea is to cut the travel budget by introducing sacking by web cam. Bingham is naturally appalled: despite the tie wallet, miniature scotch and airline sushi, Bingham believes that if you're going to wreck someones life by sacking them from the company they've worked for for thirty years, then you might at least do it to their face. There's also the small matter of his miles. Bingham has amassed a serious number of air miles and is chasing a number that he will not share with Alex, could Natalie's grand idea ground him before he makes it? The second wave of emotional thaw takes place at his sister's wedding, ostensibly and discordantly hokey, but a necessary interlude for the conclusion to exert maximum effect.

Away from the story line I was very impressed with the aerial photography of the cities on Bingham's journey, the cinematography was slick throughout, with interesting angles and great locations. Clooney was impressive as the likeable Bingham, but Vera Farmiga stole the show for me- fresh and funny with her talents running the gamut from hopeful and world-weary to darkly manipulative. Mention must also be made of the extras, real-life redundant employees who padded out this unorthodox love story with gritty, real reactions.

I won't reveal if Bingham reaches the magic number or whether the lifelong shark sprouts feathers and a long neck, but the conclusion was pleasantly revolutionary; refreshingly, not in any way you'd expect.

Marsh also liked it, but thought it wasn't Oscar material.